linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 14/33] KVM: nVMX: WARN once and fail VM-Enter if eVMCS sees VMFUNC[63:32] != 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220830133737.1539624-15-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:37:18 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 14/33] KVM: nVMX: WARN once and fail VM-Enter if eVMCS sees VMFUNC[63:32] != 0

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>

WARN and reject nested VM-Enter if KVM is using eVMCS and manages to
allow a non-zero value in the upper 32 bits of VM-function controls.  The
eVMCS code assumes all inputs are 32-bit values and subtly drops the
upper bits.  WARN instead of adding proper "support", it's unlikely the
upper bits will be defined/used in the next decade.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
index c3a5309f6e82..b64e29f1359f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
@@ -469,6 +469,14 @@ int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 					       vmcs12->vm_entry_controls)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * VM-Func controls are 64-bit, but KVM currently doesn't support any
+	 * controls in bits 63:32, i.e. dropping those bits on the consistency
+	 * check is intentional.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vmcs12->vm_function_control >> 32))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_VMFUNC,
 					       vmcs12->vm_function_control)))
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.37.2