linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: PMIC: Use sizeof() instead of hard coded value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yw42ka9czLbBmTtp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2022 19:10:57 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: PMIC: Use sizeof() instead of hard coded
 value

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 06:57:28PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 04:55:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It's better to use sizeof() of a given buffer than spreading
> > a hard coded value.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks! As I replied to this, I'm preparing a v2 which will cover more
conversions. I won't use your tag because it will cover just like a half of it.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko