[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220830171825.580603-23-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:18:14 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 23/33] cpufreq: check only freq_table in __resolve_freq()
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
[ Upstream commit 6ca7076fbfaeccce173aeab832d76b9e49e1034b ]
There is no need to check if the cpufreq driver implements callback
cpufreq_driver::target_index. The logic in the __resolve_freq uses
the frequency table available in the policy. It doesn't matter if the
driver provides 'target_index' or 'target' callback. It just has to
populate the 'policy->freq_table'.
Thus, check only frequency table during the frequency resolving call.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 2cad427741647..f9fd1b6c15d42 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static unsigned int __resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
- if (!cpufreq_driver->target_index)
+ if (!policy->freq_table)
return target_freq;
idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists