[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bd708e6-2cee-9177-5453-f6b152ec762c@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 20:30:54 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] testing/selftests: Add tests for the is_signed_type()
macro
On 8/29/22 19:33, Isabella Basso wrote:
>> +#include <kunit/test.h>
>> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
>
> Nit: I don’t know if that makes a huge difference but you might include
> `<linux/compiler.h>` directly to make the final object smaller. Of course, that
> would ideally be a change happening in 2/2 but that was already merged :).
Right, that could have been done in patch 2/2 but I think this can also
be done as a follow-up patch. I'm not sure what Kees prefers?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists