[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yw2E937l+GARR3Vb@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 04:33:11 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
mike.kravetz@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
william.kucharski@...cle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
peterx@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, ccross@...gle.com,
hughd@...gle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb: add folio support to hugetlb specific
flag macros
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 04:00:08PM -0700, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> #define TESTHPAGEFLAG(uname, flname) \
> +static __always_inline \
> +int folio_test_hugetlb_##flname(struct folio *folio) \
One change I made was to have folio_test_foo() return bool instead of
int. It helps the compiler really understand what's going on. Maybe
some humans too ;-)
> + { void **private = &folio->private; \
> + return test_bit(HPG_##flname, (void *)((unsigned long)private)); \
I've made this tricky for you by making folio->private a void * instead
of the unsigned long in page. Would this look better as ...
{ \
void *private = &folio->private; \
return test_bit(HPG_##flname, private); \
perhaps?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists