| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:39:48 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
CC: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com" <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/19] Partially revert "KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque
param to additional arch funcs"
On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 05:01 -0700, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
>
> This partially reverts commit b99040853738 ("KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque
> param to additional arch funcs") remove opaque from
> kvm_arch_check_processor_compat because no one uses this opaque now.
> Address conflicts for ARM (due to file movement) and manually handle RISC-V
> which comes after the commit. The change about kvm_arch_hardware_setup()
> in original commit are still needed so they are not reverted.
>
> The current implementation enables hardware (e.g. enable VMX on all CPUs),
> arch-specific initialization for the first VM creation, and disables
> hardware (in x86, disable VMX on all CPUs) for last VM destruction.
>
> To support TDX, hardware_enable_all() will be done during module loading
> time. As a result, CPU compatibility check will be opportunistically moved
> to hardware_enable_nolock(), which doesn't take any argument. Instead of
> passing 'opaque' around to hardware_enable_nolock() and
> hardware_enable_all(), just remove the unused 'opaque' argument from
> kvm_arch_check_processor_compat().
This patch now is not part of TDX's series, so it doesn't make a lot sense to
put the last two paragraphs here (because the purpose is different). I think
you can just use Chao's original patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> Acked-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216031528.92558-3-chao.gao@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kvm/main.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 16 +++-------------
> 8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 2ff0ef62abad..3385fb57c11a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
> +int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
> index a25e0b73ee70..092d09fb6a7e 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
> +int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index fb1490761c87..7b56d6ccfdfb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
> +int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void)
> {
> return kvmppc_core_check_processor_compat();
> }
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/main.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/main.c
> index 1549205fe5fe..f8d6372d208f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/main.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/main.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ long kvm_arch_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
> +int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index edfd4bbd0cba..e26d4dd85668 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
> +int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 985487fe0d63..ca920b6b925d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -11994,7 +11994,7 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void)
> static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_unsetup)();
> }
>
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
> +int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id());
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index f4519d3689e1..eab352902de7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void);
> void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void);
> int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque);
> void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void);
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque);
> +int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void);
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 584a5bab3af3..4243a9541543 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -5799,22 +5799,14 @@ void kvm_unregister_perf_callbacks(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> -struct kvm_cpu_compat_check {
> - void *opaque;
> - int *ret;
> -};
> -
> -static void check_processor_compat(void *data)
> +static void check_processor_compat(void *rtn)
> {
> - struct kvm_cpu_compat_check *c = data;
> -
> - *c->ret = kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(c->opaque);
> + *(int *)rtn = kvm_arch_check_processor_compat();
> }
>
> int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
> struct module *module)
> {
> - struct kvm_cpu_compat_check c;
> int r;
> int cpu;
>
> @@ -5842,10 +5834,8 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
> if (r < 0)
> goto out_free_1;
>
> - c.ret = &r;
> - c.opaque = opaque;
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> - smp_call_function_single(cpu, check_processor_compat, &c, 1);
> + smp_call_function_single(cpu, check_processor_compat, &r, 1);
> if (r < 0)
> goto out_free_2;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists