[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220830224259.412342-7-vannapurve@google.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:42:57 +0000
From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
To: x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, shuah@...nel.org, yang.zhong@...el.com,
drjones@...hat.com, ricarkol@...gle.com, aaronlewis@...gle.com,
wei.w.wang@...el.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
corbet@....net, hughd@...gle.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
bfields@...ldses.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com, yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com,
jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
michael.roth@....com, qperret@...gle.com, steven.price@....com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org,
vbabka@...e.cz, marcorr@...gle.com, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
pgonda@...gle.com, nikunj@....com, seanjc@...gle.com,
diviness@...gle.com, maz@...nel.org, dmatlack@...gle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com,
mizhang@...gle.com, bgardon@...gle.com,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC V2 PATCH 6/8] selftests: kvm: Support executing SEV VMs with
private memory
Add support of executing SEV VMs for testing private memory conversion
scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
---
.../kvm/include/x86_64/private_mem.h | 1 +
.../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/private_mem.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/private_mem.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/private_mem.h
index 183b53b8c486..d3ef88da837c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/private_mem.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/private_mem.h
@@ -49,5 +49,6 @@ struct vm_setup_info {
};
void execute_vm_with_private_mem(struct vm_setup_info *info);
+void execute_sev_vm_with_private_mem(struct vm_setup_info *info);
#endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/private_mem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/private_mem.c
index 28d93754e1f2..0eb8f92d19e8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/private_mem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/private_mem.c
@@ -348,3 +348,89 @@ void execute_vm_with_private_mem(struct vm_setup_info *info)
ucall_uninit(vm);
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+
+/*
+ * Execute Sev vm with private memory memslots.
+ *
+ * Input Args:
+ * info - pointer to a structure containing information about setting up a SEV
+ * VM with private memslots
+ *
+ * Output Args: None
+ *
+ * Return: None
+ *
+ * Function called by host userspace logic in selftests to execute SEV vm
+ * logic. It will install two memslots:
+ * 1) memslot 0 : containing all the boot code/stack pages
+ * 2) test_mem_slot : containing the region of memory that would be used to test
+ * private/shared memory accesses to a memory backed by private memslots
+ */
+void execute_sev_vm_with_private_mem(struct vm_setup_info *info)
+{
+ uint8_t measurement[512];
+ struct sev_vm *sev;
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_enable_cap cap;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ uint32_t memslot0_pages = info->memslot0_pages;
+ uint64_t test_area_gpa, test_area_size;
+ struct test_setup_info *test_info = &info->test_info;
+
+ sev = sev_vm_create_with_flags(info->policy, memslot0_pages, KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);
+ TEST_ASSERT(sev, "Sev VM creation failed");
+ vm = sev_get_vm(sev);
+ vm->use_ucall_pool = true;
+ vm_set_pgt_alloc_tracking(vm);
+ vm_create_irqchip(vm);
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(info->guest_fn, "guest_fn not present");
+ vcpu = vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0, info->guest_fn);
+ kvm_vm_elf_load(vm, program_invocation_name);
+
+ vm_check_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_EXIT_HYPERCALL);
+ cap.cap = KVM_CAP_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
+ cap.flags = 0;
+ cap.args[0] = (1 << KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE);
+ vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ENABLE_CAP, &cap);
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(test_info->test_area_size, "Test mem size not present");
+
+ test_area_size = test_info->test_area_size;
+ test_area_gpa = test_info->test_area_gpa;
+ vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, test_info->test_area_mem_src, test_area_gpa,
+ test_info->test_area_slot, test_area_size / vm->page_size,
+ KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);
+ vm_update_private_mem(vm, test_area_gpa, test_area_size, ALLOCATE_MEM);
+
+ virt_map(vm, test_area_gpa, test_area_gpa, test_area_size/vm->page_size);
+
+ vm_map_page_table(vm, GUEST_PGT_MIN_VADDR);
+ sev_gpgt_info = (struct guest_pgt_info *)vm_setup_pgt_info_buf(vm,
+ GUEST_PGT_MIN_VADDR);
+ sev_enc_bit = sev_get_enc_bit(sev);
+ is_sev_vm = true;
+ sync_global_to_guest(vm, sev_enc_bit);
+ sync_global_to_guest(vm, sev_gpgt_info);
+ sync_global_to_guest(vm, is_sev_vm);
+
+ vm_update_private_mem_internal(vm, 0, (memslot0_pages << MIN_PAGE_SHIFT),
+ ALLOCATE_MEM, false);
+
+ /* Allocations/setup done. Encrypt initial guest payload. */
+ sev_vm_launch(sev);
+
+ /* Dump the initial measurement. A test to actually verify it would be nice. */
+ sev_vm_launch_measure(sev, measurement);
+ pr_info("guest measurement: ");
+ for (uint32_t i = 0; i < 32; ++i)
+ pr_info("%02x", measurement[i]);
+ pr_info("\n");
+
+ sev_vm_launch_finish(sev);
+
+ vcpu_work(vm, vcpu, info);
+
+ sev_vm_free(sev);
+ is_sev_vm = false;
+}
--
2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists