[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3801995e-1eb5-1184-a9ba-2cec1d19bc58@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:49:08 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: "D. Starke" <daniel.starke@...mens.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] tty: n_gsm: add enumeration for gsm encodings
On 23. 08. 22, 8:22, D. Starke wrote:
> From: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
>
> Add an enumeration for the gsm mux encoding types to improve code
> readability and to avoid invalid values. Only two values are defined by the
> standard:
> - basic option mode
> - advanced option mode (uses ISO HDLC standard transparency mechanism)
>
> Also remove redundant configuration in gsmld_open(). The same value is
> already set in gsm_alloc_mux() which is also called in gsmld_open().
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> No changes since v1.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> index caa5c14ed57f..5bf09d129357 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
...
> @@ -2651,7 +2656,7 @@ static void gsm_copy_config_values(struct gsm_mux *gsm,
> {
> memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c));
> c->adaption = gsm->adaption;
> - c->encapsulation = gsm->encoding;
> + c->encapsulation = (int)gsm->encoding;
IIRC, the C standard says enum behave like int. So why is the cast needed?
> c->initiator = gsm->initiator;
> c->t1 = gsm->t1;
> c->t2 = gsm->t2;
...
> @@ -2942,8 +2947,6 @@ static int gsmld_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
> tty->receive_room = 65536;
>
> /* Attach the initial passive connection */
> - gsm->encoding = 1;
> -
This doesn't relate to "add enumeration for gsm encodings". Why do you
remove this line?
> gsmld_attach_gsm(tty, gsm);
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists