[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1661846328-107799-1-git-send-email-liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:58:48 +0800
From: Liu Song <liusong@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] block: remove bio_check_ro
From: Liu Song <liusong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Partially revert make "bio_check_ro" only return false, and may generate
at most one warning print.
>From the commit log of a32e236eb9, it has been stated that it is
compatible with the old lvm tool, so there is a high probability that
this alarm will not really be noticed, so it is better to remove it
directly.
Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liusong@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 17 +----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index a0d1104..811c2dc 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -487,20 +487,6 @@ static int __init fail_make_request_debugfs(void)
late_initcall(fail_make_request_debugfs);
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST */
-static inline bool bio_check_ro(struct bio *bio)
-{
- if (op_is_write(bio_op(bio)) && bdev_read_only(bio->bi_bdev)) {
- if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) && !bio_sectors(bio))
- return false;
- pr_warn("Trying to write to read-only block-device %pg\n",
- bio->bi_bdev);
- /* Older lvm-tools actually trigger this */
- return false;
- }
-
- return false;
-}
-
static noinline int should_fail_bio(struct bio *bio)
{
if (should_fail_request(bdev_whole(bio->bi_bdev), bio->bi_iter.bi_size))
@@ -722,8 +708,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
if (should_fail_bio(bio))
goto end_io;
- if (unlikely(bio_check_ro(bio)))
- goto end_io;
+
if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_REMAPPED)) {
if (unlikely(bio_check_eod(bio)))
goto end_io;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists