[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yw3Pw9kwDDKXuqC+@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:52:19 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] serial: Add kserial_rs485 to avoid wasted space
due to .padding
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:29:56AM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> -static int serial_rs485_from_user(struct serial_rs485 *rs485,
> +static int serial_rs485_from_user(struct kserial_rs485 *rs485,
> const struct serial_rs485 __user *rs485_user)
> {
> - if (copy_from_user(rs485, rs485_user, sizeof(*rs485)))
> + struct serial_rs485 rs485_uapi;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&rs485_uapi, rs485_user, sizeof(*rs485)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + *rs485 = *((struct kserial_rs485 *)&rs485_uapi);
Ah, you are mapping this on top of the existing structure, so there was
no padding in the original one, why say that?
> +/*
> + * Compile-time asserts for struct kserial_rs485 and struct serial_rs485 equality
> + * (except padding).
This does not take into account any padding, in fact it's the opposite
as all of this:
> + */
> +static_assert(offsetof(struct kserial_rs485, flags) ==
> + offsetof(struct serial_rs485, flags));
> +static_assert(offsetof(struct kserial_rs485, delay_rts_before_send) ==
> + offsetof(struct serial_rs485, delay_rts_before_send));
> +static_assert(offsetof(struct kserial_rs485, delay_rts_after_send) ==
> + offsetof(struct serial_rs485, delay_rts_after_send));
> +static_assert(offsetof(struct kserial_rs485, addr_recv) ==
> + offsetof(struct serial_rs485, addr_recv));
> +static_assert(offsetof(struct kserial_rs485, addr_dest) ==
> + offsetof(struct serial_rs485, addr_dest));
> +static_assert(sizeof(struct kserial_rs485) <= sizeof(struct serial_rs485));
Is there to ensure that the offsets are exactly the same, no padding
involved anywhere.
So I don't understand the problem you are trying to solve here,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists