[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yw1sKTOEs1Nrdb2S@google.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:47:21 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/test_printf.c: Add ip6 tests
On (22/08/29 20:31), Kent Overstreet wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c
> index 4bd15a593f..6a56dbf076 100644
> --- a/lib/test_printf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_printf.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/dcache.h>
> #include <linux/socket.h>
> #include <linux/in.h>
> +#include <linux/in6.h>
>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> @@ -61,6 +62,9 @@ do_test(int bufsize, const char *expect, int elen,
> pr_warn("vsnprintf(buf, %d, \"%s\", ...) returned %d, expected %d\n",
> bufsize, fmt, ret, elen);
> return 1;
> + pr_warn("vsnprintf(buf, %d, \"%s\", ...) returned %d, expected %d (%s != %s)\n",
> + bufsize, fmt, ret, elen, test_buffer, expect);
> + return 1;
> }
I assume you intended to replace first pr_warn() with the second one?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists