[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9b5e312-4999-4410-03be-299e95bbe8b2@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:00:23 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: update beryllium
compatible property
On 28/08/2022 23:57, Joel Selvaraj wrote:
> There are two panel variants of Xiaomi Poco F1. Tianma and EBBG panel.
> The previous beryllium dts supported the Tianma variant. In order to
> add support for EBBG variant, the common nodes from beryllium dts are
> moved to a new common dtsi and to make the variants distinguishable,
> sdm845-xiaomi-beryllium.dts is now named as
> sdm845-xiaomi-beryllium-tianma.dts. The board's model and compatible
> properties are also renamed to distinguish between the variants.
> So update the dt-bindings to reflect the new compatible value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> index fb1d00bcc847..e465ca45c07f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ properties:
> - sony,akatsuki-row
> - sony,apollo-row
> - thundercomm,db845c
> - - xiaomi,beryllium
> + - xiaomi,beryllium-tianma
The board compatibles are not that important for ABI yet this creates
precedence, so I am against it. Simple renaming should not be a reason
to change compatibles.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists