[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yw4H6rbVcu7Aaaa/@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:51:54 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Linyu Yuan <quic_linyyuan@...cinc.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 5.19] NULL dereference by ucsi_acpi driver
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:44:26AM +0800, Linyu Yuan wrote:
>
> On 8/21/2022 2:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 06:32:43PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we've got multiple reports about 5.19 kernel starting crashing after
> > > some time, and this turned out to be triggered by ucsi_acpi driver.
> > > The details are found in:
> > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202386
> > >
> > > The culprit seems to be the commit 87d0e2f41b8c
> > > usb: typec: ucsi: add a common function ucsi_unregister_connectors()
> > Adding Heikki to the thread...
> >
> > > This commit looks as if it were a harmless cleanup, but this failed in
> > > a subtle way. Namely, in the error scenario, the driver gets an error
> > > at ucsi_register_altmodes(), and goes to the error handling to release
> > > the resources. Through this refactoring, the release part was unified
> > > to a funciton ucsi_unregister_connectors(). And there, it has a NULL
> > > check of con->wq, and it bails out the loop if it's NULL.
> > > Meanwhile, ucsi_register_port() itself still calls destroy_workqueue()
> > > and clear con->wq at its error path. This ended up in the leftover
> > > power supply device with the uninitialized / cleared device.
> > >
> > > It was confirmed that the problem could be avoided by a simple
> > > revert.
> > I'll be glad to revert this now, unless Heikki thinks:
> >
> > > I guess another fix could be removing the part clearing con->wq, i.e.
> > >
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> > > @@ -1192,11 +1192,6 @@ static int ucsi_register_port(struct ucsi *ucsi, int index)
> > > out_unlock:
> > > mutex_unlock(&con->lock);
> > > - if (ret && con->wq) {
> > > - destroy_workqueue(con->wq);
> > > - con->wq = NULL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > ... but it's totally untested and I'm not entirely sure whether it's
> > > better.
>
> this part is original code, yes, but when I make the change you mentioned,
>
> as in the function ucsi_unregister_connectors(), just use con->wq to
> represent which connector initialized previous,
>
> indeed if we clear it in ucsi_register_port(), something will left unclear.
>
> please send a patch to fix it.
>
> I think your change is good.
Ok, can someone send me a patch to apply to the tree for this?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists