[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c313410e-bfca-0fe0-c6a8-9f98e5c21f69@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:13:19 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>, "cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@....com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"roman.gushchin@...ux.dev" <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify size2index conversion of __kmalloc_index
On 8/30/22 07:51, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 29/08/2022 à 16:21, Vlastimil Babka a écrit :
>> On 8/29/22 05:36, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 04:11:04AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 11:14:48PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
>>>>> Current size2index is implemented by one to one hardcode mapping,
>>>>> which can be improved by order_base_2().
>>>>> Must be careful to not violate compile-time optimization rule.
>>>>
>>>> This patch has been NACKed before (when submitted by other people).
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm right.
>>> https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1606.2/05402.html
>>>
>>> Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Yury Norov wrote:
>>>>> There will be no fls() for constant at runtime because ilog2() calculates
>>>>> constant values at compile-time as well. From this point of view,
>>>>> this patch removes code duplication, as we already have compile-time
>>>>> log() calculation in kernel, and should re-use it whenever possible.\
>>>
>>>> The reason not to use ilog there was that the constant folding did not
>>>> work correctly with one or the other architectures/compilers. If you want
>>>> to do this then please verify that all arches reliably do produce a
>>>> constant there.
>>>
>>> Can we re-evaluate this?
>>
>> Is there a way to turn inability of compile-time calculation to a
>> compile-time error? (when size_is_constant=true etc). Then we could try and
>> see if anything breaks in -next.
>>
>>
>
> The following will generate a build error if the function
> constant_check() is not called with a buildtime constant argument.
>
> static void __always_inline constant_check(unsigned long val)
> {
> BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(val));
> }
>
> Is that what you are looking for ?
Maybe, if we can rely on these two being equivalent:
- __kmalloc_index(x) is evaluated compile-time
- __builtin_constant_p(__kmalloc_index(x)) is true
Logically such equivalency should be expected, and a quick attempt
locally with recent gcc seems to work fine, but I guess we'll have to
try in -next for a bit and see if anything comes out.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists