Message-ID: <8aa159a1-f7e0-e54a-6a03-b76c563c62a6@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:18:59 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Tim Van Patten <timvp@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Alistair Francis <alistair@...stair23.me>,
        Angela Czubak <acz@...ihalf.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Bartosz Szczepanek <bsz@...ihalf.com>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "jingle.wu" <jingle.wu@....com.tw>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] acpi: i2c: Use SharedAndWake and ExclusiveAndWake to
 enable wake irq

Hi,

On 8/31/22 16:37, Raul Rangel wrote:
> Interesting... The patch series is here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/cover/20220830231541.1135813-1-rrangel@chromium.org/
> 
> I'll look into why you only got added to 2 of the emails.

FWIW I also received the full series without problems.

I'll try to reply to this soon-ish, but I have a bit of
a patch backlog to process and I'm trying to process
the backlog in FIFO order and this is one of the last
series in the backlog ...

Regards,

Hans


> 
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:52 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 05:15:33PM -0600, Raul E Rangel wrote:
>>> Today, i2c drivers are making the assumption that their IRQs can also
>>> be used as wake IRQs. This isn't always the case and it can lead to
>>> spurious wakes. This has recently started to affect AMD Chromebooks.
>>> With the introduction of
>>> d62bd5ce12d7 ("pinctrl: amd: Implement irq_set_wake"), the AMD GPIO
>>> controller gained the capability to set the wake bit on each GPIO. The
>>> ACPI specification defines two ways to inform the system if a device is
>>> wake capable:
>>> 1) The _PRW object defines the GPE that can be used to wake the system.
>>> 2) Setting ExclusiveAndWake or SharedAndWake in the _CRS GpioInt.
>>>
>>> Currently only the first method is supported. The i2c drivers don't have
>>> any indication that the IRQ is wake capable, so they guess. This causes
>>> spurious interrupts, for example:
>>> * We have an ACPI HID device that has `_PR0` and `_PR3`. It doesn't have
>>>   `_PRW` or `ExclusiveAndWake` so that means the device can't wake the
>>>   system.
>>> * The IRQ line is active level low for this device and is pulled up by
>>>   the power resource defined in `_PR0`/`_PR3`.
>>> * The i2c driver will (incorrectly) arm the GPIO for wake by calling
>>>   `enable_irq_wake` as part of its suspend hook.
>>> * ACPI will power down the device since it doesn't have a wake GPE
>>>   associated with it.
>>> * When the device is powered down, the IRQ line will drop, and it will
>>>   trigger a wake event.
>>>
>>> See the following debug log:
>>> [   42.335804] PM: Suspending system (s2idle)
>>> [   42.340186] amd_gpio AMD0030:00: RX: Setting wake for pin 89 to enable
>>> [   42.467736]     power-0416 __acpi_power_off      : Power resource [PR00] turned off
>>> [   42.467739] device_pm-0280 device_set_power      : Device [H05D] transitioned to D3cold
>>> [   42.475210] PM: pm_system_irq_wakeup: 11 triggered pinctrl_amd
>>> [   42.535293] PM: Wakeup unrelated to ACPI SCI
>>> [   42.535294] PM: resume from suspend-to-idle
>>>
>>> In order to fix this, we need to take into account the wake capable bit
>>> defined on the GpioInt. This is accomplished by:
>>> * Migrating some of the i2c drivers over to using the PM subsystem to
>>>   manage the wake IRQ. max8925-i2c, elants_i2c, and raydium_i2c_ts still
>>>   need to be migrated, I can do that depending on the feedback to this
>>>   patch series.
>>> * Expose the wake_capable bit from the ACPI GpioInt resource to the
>>>   i2c core.
>>> * Use the wake_capable bit in the i2c core to call
>>>   `dev_pm_set_wake_irq`. This reuses the existing device tree flow.
>>> * Make the i2c drivers stop calling `dev_pm_set_wake_irq` since it's now
>>>   handled by the i2c core.
>>> * Make the ACPI device PM system aware of the wake_irq. This is
>>>   necessary so the device doesn't incorrectly get powered down when a
>>>   wake_irq is enabled.
>>>
>>> I've tested this code with various combinations of having _PRW,
>>> ExclusiveAndWake and power resources all defined or not defined, but it
>>> would be great if others could test this out on their hardware.
>>
>> I have got only cover letter and a single patch (#3). What's going on?
>>
>> Note: I'm also reviewer of I涎 DesignWare driver, you really have to
>> fix your tools / submission process and try again. No review for this
>> series.
>>
>> --
>> With Best Regards,
>> Andy Shevchenko
>>
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists