[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220831155136.23434-7-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 23:51:36 +0800
From: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: ming.lei@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V2 6/6] ublk_drv: add START_USER_RECOVERY and END_USER_RECOVERY support
START_USER_RECOVERY and END_USER_RECOVERY are two new control commands
to support user recovery feature.
After a crash, user should send START_USER_RECOVERY, it will:
(1) check if (a)current ublk_device is UBLK_S_DEV_RECOVERING which was
set by monitor_work and (b)the file struct is released. We always
expect crash of the ublksrv 'process', not exit of a single
ubq_daemon 'pthread'.
(2) reinit all ubqs, including:
(a) put the dying task(thread) and reset ->ubq_daemon to NULL.
(b) reset all ublk_io.
(3) reset ub->mm to NULL.
Then, user should start a new 'process' and send FETCH_REQ on each
ubq_daemon.
Finally, user should send END_USER_RECOVERY, it will:
(1) wait for all new ubq_daemons getting ready.
(2) unquiesce the request queue and expect incoming ublk_queue_rq()
(3) convert state to UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE
(4) schedule monitor_work again
Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 130 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 0e185d1fa2c4..2d1f3e032606 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1964,6 +1964,130 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_set_params(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
return ret;
}
+static void ublk_queue_start_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ /* All old ioucmds have to be completed/canceled by io_uring_cmd_done(). */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ubq->nr_io_ready);
+
+ /* old daemon is PF_EXITING, put it now */
+ put_task_struct(ubq->ubq_daemon);
+ /* have to set it to NULL, otherwise ub won't accept new FETCH_REQ */
+ ubq->ubq_daemon = NULL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
+ struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
+
+ /* forget everything now and be ready for new FETCH_REQ */
+ io->flags = 0;
+ io->cmd = NULL;
+ io->addr = 0;
+ }
+}
+
+static int ublk_ctrl_start_recovery(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
+{
+ struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header = (struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *)cmd->cmd;
+ struct ublk_device *ub;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+ int i;
+
+ ub = ublk_get_device_from_id(header->dev_id);
+ if (!ub)
+ return ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
+
+ if (!ublk_can_use_recovery(ub))
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ /*
+ * START_RECOVERY is only allowd after:
+ *
+ * (1) UB_STATE_OPEN is not set, which means the dying process is exited
+ * and related io_uring ctx is freed so file struct of /dev/ublkcX is
+ * released.
+ *
+ * (2) UBLK_S_DEV_RECOVERING is set, which means the monitor_work:
+ * (a)has requeued all inflight rqs whose io_flags is ACTIVE
+ * (b)has requeued/aborted all inflight rqs whose io_flags is NOT ACTIVE
+ * (c)has completed/camceled all ioucmds owned by ther dying process
+ */
+ if (test_bit(UB_STATE_OPEN, &ub->state) ||
+ ub->dev_info.state != UBLK_S_DEV_RECOVERING) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ pr_devel("%s: start recovery for dev id %d.\n", __func__, header->dev_id);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++) {
+ struct ublk_queue *ubq = ublk_get_queue(ub, i);
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(ubq->ubq_daemon && ubq_daemon_is_dying(ubq)));
+ pr_devel("%s: prepare for recovering qid %d\n", __func__, ubq->q_id);
+ ublk_queue_start_recovery(ub, ubq);
+ }
+
+ /* set to NULL, otherwise new ubq_daemon cannot mmap the io_cmd_buf */
+ ub->mm = NULL;
+ ub->nr_queues_ready = 0;
+ init_completion(&ub->completion);
+ ret = 0;
+
+ out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
+ ublk_put_device(ub);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
+{
+ struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header = (struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *)cmd->cmd;
+ int ublksrv_pid = (int)header->data[0];
+ struct ublk_device *ub;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+ ub = ublk_get_device_from_id(header->dev_id);
+ if (!ub)
+ return ret;
+
+ pr_devel("%s: Waiting for new ubq_daemon is ready, dev id %d...\n",
+ __func__, header->dev_id);
+ /* wait until new ubq_daemon sending all FETCH_REQ */
+ wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ub->completion);
+ pr_devel("%s: All new ubq_daemon is ready, dev id %d\n",
+ __func__, header->dev_id);
+
+ mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
+
+ if (!ublk_can_use_recovery(ub))
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ /* monitor_work should set UBLK_S_DEV_RECOVERING */
+ if (ub->dev_info.state != UBLK_S_DEV_RECOVERING) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ublksrv_pid;
+ pr_devel("%s: new ublksrv_pid %d, dev id %d\n",
+ __func__, ublksrv_pid, header->dev_id);
+ blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+ pr_devel("%s: queue unquiesced, dev id %d.\n",
+ __func__, header->dev_id);
+
+ ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
+ schedule_delayed_work(&ub->monitor_work, UBLK_DAEMON_MONITOR_PERIOD);
+ /* We are good to redo requests now */
+ blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+ ret = 0;
+ out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
+ ublk_put_device(ub);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
unsigned int issue_flags)
{
@@ -2005,6 +2129,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
case UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS:
ret = ublk_ctrl_set_params(cmd);
break;
+ case UBLK_CMD_START_USER_RECOVERY:
+ ret = ublk_ctrl_start_recovery(cmd);
+ break;
+ case UBLK_CMD_END_USER_RECOVERY:
+ ret = ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(cmd);
+ break;
default:
break;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists