[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALMp9eRKa97GbvbML=VTrQ=Y3gaF6eZtNhrWD2UNGbL1Q8r0fA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:58:25 -0700
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] Revert "KVM: SVM: Introduce hybrid-AVIC mode"
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:49 AM Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com> wrote:
> In this case I say that there is no wiggle room for KVM to not allow different APIC bases
> on each CPU - the spec 100% allows it, but in KVM it is broken.
This would actually be my first candidate for
Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/errata.rst!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists