[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220831180805.2693546-1-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:07:56 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 01/10] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock_strict() strict QS reporting
From: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y
report the quiescent state directly from the outermost rcu_read_unlock().
However, the current CPU's rcu_data structure's ->cpu_no_qs.b.norm
might still be set, in which case rcu_report_qs_rdp() will exit early,
thus failing to report quiescent state.
This commit therefore causes rcu_read_unlock_strict() to clear
CPU's rcu_data structure's ->cpu_no_qs.b.norm field before invoking
rcu_report_qs_rdp().
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 438ecae6bd7e7..86772c95ed0ae 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -824,6 +824,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_strict(void)
if (irqs_disabled() || preempt_count() || !rcu_state.gp_kthread)
return;
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+ rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm = false;
rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp);
udelay(rcu_unlock_delay);
}
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists