[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220831180805.2693546-5-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:08:00 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 05/10] rcu: Document reason for rcu_all_qs() call to preempt_disable()
Given that rcu_all_qs() is in non-preemptible kernels, why on earth should
it invoke preempt_disable()? This commit adds the reason, which is to
work nicely with debugging enabled in CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y kernels.
Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 4152816dd29f6..c46b3c74dad1f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ void rcu_all_qs(void)
if (!raw_cpu_read(rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs))
return;
- preempt_disable();
+ preempt_disable(); // For CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y kernels
/* Load rcu_urgent_qs before other flags. */
if (!smp_load_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs))) {
preempt_enable();
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists