[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <709d9f58-0ae9-833a-ca54-7b50307b377e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:14:02 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] selftests/sgx: retry the ioctls returned with EAGAIN
On 8/30/22 19:31, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On 8/29/2022 8:12 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> From: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> For EMODT and EREMOVE ioctls with a large range, kernel
>> ioctl()s?
> Ioctl is common enough to be considered as noun and is
> widely phrased like that in commit messages. I don't
> see any added clarity.
I definitely prefer ioctl().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists