[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2b76530-82a2-6ac1-32ea-696e653d767d@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:07:35 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Paul Menzel" <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] selftests/sgx: Add SGX selftest
augment_via_eaccept_long
Hi Jarkko,
On 8/31/2022 10:38 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> From: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>
>
> Add a new test case which is same as augment_via_eaccept but adds a
> larger number of EPC pages to stress test EAUG via EACCEPT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>
> Co-developed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> ---
> v3:
> - Addressed Reinette's feedback:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/bd5285dd-d6dd-8a46-fca9-728db5e2f369@intel.com/
> v2:
> - Addressed Reinette's feedback:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/24bd8e42-ff4e-0090-d9e1-cd81e4807f21@intel.com/
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c | 5 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c | 143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.h | 3 +-
Is this test passing on your system? This version is missing the change to
mrenclave_ecreate() that causes SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_INIT to fail when I try it out.
> 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c
> index 94bdeac1cf04..47b2786d6a77 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,8 @@ uint64_t encl_get_entry(struct encl *encl, const char *symbol)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -bool encl_load(const char *path, struct encl *encl, unsigned long heap_size)
> +bool encl_load(const char *path, struct encl *encl, unsigned long heap_size,
> + unsigned long edmm_size)
> {
> const char device_path[] = "/dev/sgx_enclave";
> struct encl_segment *seg;
> @@ -300,7 +301,7 @@ bool encl_load(const char *path, struct encl *encl, unsigned long heap_size)
>
> encl->src_size = encl->segment_tbl[j].offset + encl->segment_tbl[j].size;
>
> - for (encl->encl_size = 4096; encl->encl_size < encl->src_size; )
> + for (encl->encl_size = 4096; encl->encl_size < encl->src_size + edmm_size;)
> encl->encl_size <<= 1;
>
> return true;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> index 9820b3809c69..c5aa9f323745 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@
>
> static const uint64_t MAGIC = 0x1122334455667788ULL;
> static const uint64_t MAGIC2 = 0x8877665544332211ULL;
> +/* Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB55912A7F47A84EC9913A6352F6999@...PR11MB5591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> */
> +static const uint64_t EDMM_SIZE_LONG = 8L * 1024L * 1024L * 1024L;
> +static const uint64_t TIMEOUT_LONG = 900; /* seconds */
> +
Apologies if my feedback was vague - I actually think that the comments in V1 added
valuable information, it was just the variation in formatting that was distracting.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists