[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875yi8uju3.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:30:44 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jpoimboe@...nel.org, jikos@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.cz,
pmladek@...e.com, x86@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] livepatch: Clear relocation targets on a module removal
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:53:13AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
>> From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
>>
>> Josh reported a bug:
>>
>> When the object to be patched is a module, and that module is
>> rmmod'ed and reloaded, it fails to load with:
>>
>> module: x86/modules: Skipping invalid relocation target, existing value is nonzero for type 2, loc 00000000ba0302e9, val ffffffffa03e293c
>> livepatch: failed to initialize patch 'livepatch_nfsd' for module 'nfsd' (-8)
>> livepatch: patch 'livepatch_nfsd' failed for module 'nfsd', refusing to load module 'nfsd'
>>
>> The livepatch module has a relocation which references a symbol
>> in the _previous_ loading of nfsd. When apply_relocate_add()
>> tries to replace the old relocation with a new one, it sees that
>> the previous one is nonzero and it errors out.
>>
>> On ppc64le, we have a similar issue:
>>
>> module_64: livepatch_nfsd: Expected nop after call, got e8410018 at e_show+0x60/0x548 [livepatch_nfsd]
>> livepatch: failed to initialize patch 'livepatch_nfsd' for module 'nfsd' (-8)
>> livepatch: patch 'livepatch_nfsd' failed for module 'nfsd', refusing to load module 'nfsd'
...
>>
>
> Hi Song,
>
> Applying your patch on top of my latest klp-convert-tree branch [1], I
> modified a few of its late module patching tests
> (tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-song.sh) such that:
>
> 1 - A livepatch module is loaded
> - this module contains klp-relocations to objects in (2)
> 2 - A target test module is loaded
> 3 - Unload the test target module
> - Clear klp-relocations in (1)
> 4 - Repeat target module load (2) / unload (3) a few times
> 5 - Unload livepatch module
If you push that test code somewhere I could test it on ppc64le.
> The results:
>
> x86_64 : pass
> s390x : pass
> ppc64le : crash
>
> I suspect Power 32-bit would suffer the same fate, but I don't have
> hardware to verify. See the kernel log from the crash below...
>
>
> ===== TEST: klp-convert symbols (late module patching) =====
> % modprobe test_klp_convert1
> test_klp_convert1: tainting kernel with TAINT_LIVEPATCH
> livepatch: enabling patch 'test_klp_convert1'
> livepatch: 'test_klp_convert1': starting patching transition
> livepatch: 'test_klp_convert1': patching complete
> % modprobe test_klp_convert_mod
> livepatch: applying patch 'test_klp_convert1' to loading module 'test_klp_convert_mod'
> test_klp_convert1: saved_command_line, 0: BOOT_IMAGE=(ieee1275//vdevice/v-scsi@...00003/disk@...0000000000000,msdos2)/vmlinuz-5.19.0+ root=/dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--p9z--18--lp7-root ro crashkernel=2G-4G:384M,4G-16G:512M,16G-64G:1G,64G-128G:2G,128G-:4G rd.lvm.lv=rhel_ibm-p9z-18-lp7/root rd.lvm.lv=rhel_ibm-p9z-18-lp7/swap
> test_klp_convert1: driver_name, 0: test_klp_convert_mod
> test_klp_convert1: test_klp_get_driver_name(), 0: test_klp_convert_mod
> test_klp_convert1: homonym_string, 1: homonym string A
> test_klp_convert1: get_homonym_string(), 1: homonym string A
> test_klp_convert1: klp_string.12345 = lib/livepatch/test_klp_convert_mod_a.c static string
> test_klp_convert1: klp_string.67890 = lib/livepatch/test_klp_convert_mod_b.c static string
> % rmmod test_klp_convert_mod
> livepatch: reverting patch 'test_klp_convert1' on unloading module 'test_klp_convert_mod'
> module_64: Clearing ADD relocate section 48 to 6
> BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0xc008000002140150
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000005659c
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
> Modules linked in: test_klp_convert_mod(-) test_klp_convert1(K) bonding tls rfkill pseries_rng drm fuse drm_panel_orientation_quirks xfs libcrc32c sd_mod t10_pi sg ibmvscsi ibmveth scsi_transport_srp vmx_crypto dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> CPU: 6 PID: 4766 Comm: rmmod Kdump: loaded Tainted: G K 5.19.0+ #1
> NIP: c00000000005659c LR: c000000000056590 CTR: 0000000000000024
> REGS: c000000007223840 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G K (5.19.0+)
> MSR: 8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 48008282 XER: 0000000a
> CFAR: c0000000000a87e0 DAR: c008000002140150 DSISR: 0a000000 IRQMASK: 0
This is saying you don't have permissions to write at that address.
> GPR00: c000000000056568 c000000007223ae0 c000000002a68a00 0000000000000001
> GPR04: c0080000021706f0 000000000000002d 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR08: 0000000000000066 0000001200000010 0000000000000000 0000000000008000
> GPR12: 0000000000000000 c00000000ffca080 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR16: 0000010005bf1810 000000010c0f7370 c0000000011b7e50 c0000000011b7e68
> GPR20: c0080000021501c8 c008000002150228 0000000000000030 0000000060000000
> GPR24: c008000002160380 c000000056b43000 000000000000ff20 c000000056b43c00
> GPR28: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaab c000000056b43b40 0000000000000000 c00800000214014c
> NIP [c00000000005659c] clear_relocate_add+0x11c/0x1c0
> LR [c000000000056590] clear_relocate_add+0x110/0x1c0
> Call Trace:
> [c000000007223ae0] [ffffffffffffffff] 0xffffffffffffffff (unreliable)
> [c000000007223ba0] [c00000000021e3a8] klp_cleanup_module_patches_limited+0x448/0x480
> [c000000007223cb0] [c000000000220278] klp_module_going+0x68/0x94
> [c000000007223ce0] [c00000000022f480] __do_sys_delete_module.constprop.0+0x1d0/0x390
> [c000000007223db0] [c00000000002f004] system_call_exception+0x164/0x340
> [c000000007223e10] [c00000000000be68] system_call_vectored_common+0xe8/0x278
> --- interrupt: 3000 at 0x7fffa178fb6c
> NIP: 00007fffa178fb6c LR: 0000000000000000 CTR: 0000000000000000
> REGS: c000000007223e80 TRAP: 3000 Tainted: G K (5.19.0+)
> MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 48002482 XER: 00000000
> IRQMASK: 0
> GPR00: 0000000000000081 00007ffff2d1b720 00007fffa1887200 0000010005bf1878
> GPR04: 0000000000000800 000000000000000a 0000000000000000 00000000000000da
> GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007fffa201c540 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR16: 0000010005bf1810 000000010c0f7370 000000010c0f8090 000000010c0f8078
> GPR20: 000000010c0f8050 000000010c0f80a8 000000010c0f7518 000000010c0f80d0
> GPR24: 00007ffff2d1b830 00007ffff2d1efbb 0000000000000000 0000010005bf02a0
> GPR28: 00007ffff2d1be50 0000000000000000 0000010005bf1810 0000000000100000
> NIP [00007fffa178fb6c] 0x7fffa178fb6c
> LR [0000000000000000] 0x0
> --- interrupt: 3000
> Instruction dump:
> 40820044 813b002c 7ff5f82a 79293664 7d394a14 e9290010 7c69f82e 7fe9fa14
> 48052235 60000000 2c030000 41820008 <92ff0004> eadb0020 60000000 60000000
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>
> $ addr2line 0xc00000000005659c -e vmlinux
> /root/klp-convert-tree/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c:785
>
> 743 void clear_relocate_add(Elf64_Shdr *sechdrs,
> 744 const char *strtab,
> 745 unsigned int symindex,
> 746 unsigned int relsec,
> 747 struct module *me)
> 748 {
> ...
> 759 for (i = 0; i < sechdrs[relsec].sh_size / sizeof(*rela); i++) {
> ...
> 785 *instruction = PPC_RAW_NOP();
> 786 }
Has the module text been marked RW prior to this? I suspect not?
In which case you need to use patch_instruction() here.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists