[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKFNMokS2zV5hJsBkcj=wiSkOkVHiqT_jFi18aBFW_gbNHnP5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:00:34 +0900
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] nilfs2: Remove the unneeded result variable
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:34 PM wrote:
>
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Return the value nilfs_segctor_sync() directly instead of storing it in
> another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
> index 0afe0832c754..9abae2c9120e 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
> @@ -2235,7 +2235,6 @@ int nilfs_construct_segment(struct super_block *sb)
> struct the_nilfs *nilfs = sb->s_fs_info;
> struct nilfs_sc_info *sci = nilfs->ns_writer;
> struct nilfs_transaction_info *ti;
> - int err;
>
> if (!sci)
> return -EROFS;
> @@ -2243,8 +2242,7 @@ int nilfs_construct_segment(struct super_block *sb)
> /* A call inside transactions causes a deadlock. */
> BUG_ON((ti = current->journal_info) && ti->ti_magic == NILFS_TI_MAGIC);
>
> - err = nilfs_segctor_sync(sci);
> - return err;
> + return nilfs_segctor_sync(sci);
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.25.1
The patch is not wrong though this kind of minor rewrite seems endless.
Anyway, I would like to queue this unless there is an objection.
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists