lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <119e0cec-7fe0-4516-f419-22bf1b62058b@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:31:50 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>, jdelvare@...e.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, rtanwar@...linear.com,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     talel@...zon.com, hhhawa@...zon.com, jonnyc@...zon.com,
        hanochu@...zon.com, ronenk@...zon.com, itamark@...zon.com,
        shellykz@...zon.com, shorer@...zon.com, amitlavi@...zon.com,
        almogbs@...zon.com, dkl@...zon.com, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/19] hwmon: (mr75203) update pvt->v_num to the actual
 number of used sensors

On 8/30/22 21:50, Farber, Eliav wrote:
> On 8/31/2022 5:41 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 8/30/22 12:21, Eliav Farber wrote:
>>> This issue is relevant when "intel,vm-map" is set in device-tree, and
>>> defines a lower number of VMs than actually supported.
>>>
>>> This change is needed for all places that use pvt->v_num later on in the
>>> code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c b/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
>>> index 0e29877a1a9c..f89f7bb5d698 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
>>> @@ -605,6 +605,7 @@ static int mr75203_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>                                       break;
>>>
>>>                       vm_num = i;
>>> +                     pvt->v_num = i;
>>
>> How about the existing assignment in the probe function ? 
> The probe function uses a local variable vm_num which is also updated
> (just one line earlier in code) in the previous patch.
> 

I meant
	pvt->v_num = vm_num;
at line 536 of the current code, but I guess the idea is to overwrite that.

Thanks,
Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ