[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220831105913.ges3eatp5buz3bkh@quack3>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:59:13 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, tytso@....edu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, rpeterso@...hat.com, agruenba@...hat.com,
almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com, mark@...heh.com,
dushistov@...l.ru, hch@...radead.org, chengzhihao1@...wei.com,
yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] ntfs3: replace ll_rw_block()
On Wed 31-08-22 15:21:04, Zhang Yi wrote:
> ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
> guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
> could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
> been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in
> ntfs_get_block_vbo().
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ntfs3/inode.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> index 51363d4e8636..bbe7d4ea1750 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> @@ -630,12 +630,9 @@ static noinline int ntfs_get_block_vbo(struct inode *inode, u64 vbo,
> bh->b_size = block_size;
> off = vbo & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> set_bh_page(bh, page, off);
> - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
> - wait_on_buffer(bh);
> - if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> - err = -EIO;
> + err = bh_read(bh, 0);
> + if (err)
> goto out;
> - }
> zero_user_segment(page, off + voff, off + block_size);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists