[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220831110606.7c25xioli2uxcacr@quack3>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:06:06 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, tytso@....edu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, rpeterso@...hat.com, agruenba@...hat.com,
almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com, mark@...heh.com,
dushistov@...l.ru, hch@...radead.org, chengzhihao1@...wei.com,
yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] ufs: replace ll_rw_block()
On Wed 31-08-22 15:21:08, Zhang Yi wrote:
> ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
> guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
> could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
> been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ufs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ufs/balloc.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> index bd810d8239f2..bbc2159eece4 100644
> --- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> @@ -296,9 +296,7 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct inode *inode, sector_t beg,
> if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
> map_bh(bh, inode->i_sb, oldb + pos);
> if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
> - wait_on_buffer(bh);
> - if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> + if (bh_read(bh, 0)) {
> ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__,
> "read of block failed\n");
> break;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists