lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220831112652.brjnuygzkvcteadx@bogus>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:26:52 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
        Marc Bonnici <marc.bonnici@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Valentin Laurent <valentin.laurent@...stonic.com>,
        Lukas Hanel <lukas.hanel@...stonic.com>,
        Coboy Chen <coboy.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] tee: optee: Drop ffa_ops in optee_ffa structure

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 04:28:01PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 15:40, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> >
> > Since the ffa_device itself carries ffa_dev_ops now, there is no need
> > to keep a copy in optee_ffa structure.
> >
> > Drop ffa_ops in the optee_ffa structure as it is not needed anymore.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c       | 9 ++++-----
> >  drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 1 -
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> Is this patch doing anything different from patch #2? If not then I
> think both should be squashed.
>

Indeed, I thought about squashing them and forgot before getting there.
Does the review tag still apply for 2/9 after I squash this into it.

Thanks for the review.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ