linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document additional skus for sc7180 pazquel360

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6475fa6-fd3f-55cd-1b4a-b3e871cced40@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:46:11 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@....corp-partner.google.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Henry Sun <henrysun@...gle.com>,
        Bob Moragues <moragues@...omium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document additional skus
 for sc7180 pazquel360

On 31/08/2022 13:43, Yunlong Jia wrote:
> pazquel360 is an extension project based on pazquel.
> We create 3 sku on pazquel360:
>    sku 20 for LTE with physical SIM _and_ eSIM and WiFi
>    sku 21 for WiFi only
>    sku 22 for LTE with only a physical SIM
>  Both sku20 and sku22 are LTE SKUs.
>  One has the eSIM stuffed and one doesn't.
>  There is a single shared device tree for the two.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@....corp-partner.google.com>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)

So this is like fifth version of v2? I asked you to read the docs...

Please version your patches and do not send different patches with same
versions.

Best regards,
Krzysztof