[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McK=QL7m5AGZJr0CtvcW0M+iLYHWB9ErC_M8=ix2W+HAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:00:03 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
talel@...zon.com, hhhawa@...zon.com, jonnyc@...zon.com,
hanochu@...zon.com, ronenk@...zon.com, itamark@...zon.com,
shellykz@...zon.com, shorer@...zon.com, amitlavi@...zon.com,
almogbs@...zon.com, dkl@...zon.com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] add power-supply control to enable eeprom usage
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 5:49 PM Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> First patch describes the new binding property.
> Second patch adds the functionality to the driver.
>
> Change between v3 and v2:
> - Apply on top of v6.0-rc1.
>
> Change between v2 and v1:
> - Use a gpio regulator for power-supply control.
>
> Eliav Farber (2):
> dt-bindings: at24: add new optional power-supply property
> eeprom: at24: add support for power-supply control
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml | 4 ++
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
What is the difference between this and the existing "vcc" regulator?
Why are you going through all the hoops in probe if a regular
regulator_get() will return a dummy regulator if the supply is not
found?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists