linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: Allow user to customise maximum number of GPIOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yw9sVCNtaLUjZH/F@arcana.i.gnudd.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:12:36 +0200
From:   Davide Ciminaghi <ciminaghi@...dd.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/ASM HEADER FILES" 
        <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Allow user to customise maximum number of GPIOs

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 03:32:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 9:58 AM Davide Ciminaghi <ciminaghi@...dd.com> wrote:
> 
> > the sta2x11 was a chip containing AMBA peripherals and a PCIe to AMBA bridge
> > (it is still in production as far as I know, but deprecated for new designs).
> > It would typically be installed on x86 machines, so you needed to build and
> > run AMBA drivers in an x86 environment. The original drivers we started from
> > had platform data, but then we were told to switch to DTS.
> 
> For the record I think that was bad advice, I hope it wasn't me.
> But the world was different back then I suppose.
> Adding DTS to x86 which is inherently ACPI is not a good idea.
> Especially if you look at how SBSA ACPI UARTS were done
> in drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c.
>
now that I think of it, ACPI was also listed as a possible choice, but the
problem was that we didn't know much about ACPI, and took the DTS way.
So there was no bad advice, just fear of the unknown :-)

Thanks
Davide