linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] NFSD: remove redundant variable status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A854F8D3-3FB3-4B64-9CE0-16FCAE3A7D22@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:34:36 +0000
From:   Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     "cgel.zte@...il.com" <cgel.zte@...il.com>
CC:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] NFSD: remove redundant variable status



> On Aug 31, 2022, at 10:20 AM, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> 
> From: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@....com.cn>
> 
> Return value directly from fh_verify() do_open_permission()
> exp_pseudoroot() instead of getting value from
> redundant variable status.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@....com.cn>

Applied for v6.1. Thanks!


> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 16 ++++------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index 757d8959f992..7055e1c91d0e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ fh_dup2(struct svc_fh *dst, struct svc_fh *src)
> static __be32
> do_open_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_open *open, int accmode)
> {
> -	__be32 status;
> 
> 	if (open->op_truncate &&
> 		!(open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE))
> @@ -156,9 +155,7 @@ do_open_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfs
> 	if (open->op_share_deny & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_READ)
> 		accmode |= NFSD_MAY_WRITE;
> 
> -	status = fh_verify(rqstp, current_fh, S_IFREG, accmode);
> -
> -	return status;
> +	return fh_verify(rqstp, current_fh, S_IFREG, accmode);
> }
> 
> static __be32 nfsd_check_obj_isreg(struct svc_fh *fh)
> @@ -454,7 +451,6 @@ static __be32
> do_open_fhandle(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, struct nfsd4_open *open)
> {
> 	struct svc_fh *current_fh = &cstate->current_fh;
> -	__be32 status;
> 	int accmode = 0;
> 
> 	/* We don't know the target directory, and therefore can not
> @@ -479,9 +475,7 @@ do_open_fhandle(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, str
> 	if (open->op_claim_type == NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH)
> 		accmode = NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE;
> 
> -	status = do_open_permission(rqstp, current_fh, open, accmode);
> -
> -	return status;
> +	return do_open_permission(rqstp, current_fh, open, accmode);
> }
> 
> static void
> @@ -668,11 +662,9 @@ static __be32
> nfsd4_putrootfh(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> 		union nfsd4_op_u *u)
> {
> -	__be32 status;
> -
> 	fh_put(&cstate->current_fh);
> -	status = exp_pseudoroot(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh);
> -	return status;
> +
> +	return exp_pseudoroot(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh);
> }
> 
> static __be32
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

--
Chuck Lever