[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1661956807-24481-1-git-send-email-liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 22:40:07 +0800
From: Liu Song <liusong@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: move set RQF_RESV flag codes outside retry scope
From: Liu Song <liusong@...ux.alibaba.com>
There is no need to set the RQF_RESV flag again on retry, so move that
code to a more appropriate place.
Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liusong@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a17bc83..ccedb93 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -451,6 +451,9 @@ static struct request *__blk_mq_alloc_requests(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
if (data->cmd_flags & REQ_NOWAIT)
data->flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT;
+ if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED)
+ data->rq_flags |= RQF_RESV;
+
if (q->elevator) {
struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
@@ -474,9 +477,6 @@ static struct request *__blk_mq_alloc_requests(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
if (!(data->rq_flags & RQF_ELV))
blk_mq_tag_busy(data->hctx);
- if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED)
- data->rq_flags |= RQF_RESV;
-
/*
* Try batched alloc if we want more than 1 tag.
*/
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists