[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxC7+Pi4v3Bc1oXc@aptenodytes>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 16:04:40 +0200
From: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] ARM: dts: sun8i: a83t: Add MIPI CSI-2 controller
node
Hi Laurent,
On Fri 26 Aug 22, 21:59, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:28:02PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > MIPI CSI-2 is supported on the A83T with a dedicated controller that
> > covers both the protocol and D-PHY. It can be connected to the CSI
> > interface as a V4L2 subdev through the fwnode graph.
> >
> > This is not done by default since connecting the bridge without a
> > subdev attached to it will cause a failure on the CSI driver.
>
> No urgency, but would it be possible to fix this so that the CSI-2
> receiver can be connected to the CSI unconditionally in DT ? The
> connection exists at the hardware level in the SoC, and should thus
> exist here too, regardless of whether or not a sensor is connected.
Yes it's true that having the link always would be legitimate.
For the context, this CSI controller can be switched between the MIPI CSI-2
controller and a parallel sensor input (i.e. it's not dedicated to one or the
other like on the V3).
Last time I tried, having the connection between the two always there resulted
in the unability to use a parallel sensor when no sensor is attached to the
mipi csi-2 receiver. Probably because the async notifier never completes since
the mipi csi-2's subdev is never registered without a sensor subdev attached.
Do you see a way to handle this case properly?
Thanks,
Paul
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> > index 82fdb04122ca..ecf9f3b2c0c0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> > @@ -1064,6 +1064,32 @@ csi: camera@...0000 {
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > + mipi_csi2: csi@...1000 {
> > + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-mipi-csi2";
> > + reg = <0x01cb1000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 83 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_CSI>,
> > + <&ccu CLK_CSI_SCLK>,
> > + <&ccu CLK_MIPI_CSI>,
> > + <&ccu CLK_CSI_MISC>;
> > + clock-names = "bus", "mod", "mipi", "misc";
> > + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_CSI>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > +
> > + ports {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + mipi_csi2_in: port@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + mipi_csi2_out: port@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > hdmi: hdmi@...0000 {
> > compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-dw-hdmi";
> > reg = <0x01ee0000 0x10000>;
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists