[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220901143313.1491951-1-li.meng@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 22:33:12 +0800
From: Meng Li <li.meng@....com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>,
Deepak Sharma <deepak.sharma@....com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Jinzhou Su <Jinzhou.Su@....com>,
Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@....com>,
Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Meng Li <li.meng@....com>
Subject: [Suggested-by:Shuah Khan Patch 0/1] iAdd explanation for
Hi all:
According to Shuah's review comments, add a new patches for expain
X86_AMD_PSTATE_UT.
amd-pstate-ut can be modprobed even without amd-pstate module.
When the comparison test is performed, it can load other module
like acpi-cpufreq to test cases, then compare the test results.
When only the test for amd-pstate is performed, it can tell the
users they loaded a wrong module like acpi-cpufreq.
Thanks,
Jasmine
Meng Li (1):
cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add explanation for X86_AMD_PSTATE_UT
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.x86 | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists