[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxDDD2DF9KFDQ+Yk@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:34:55 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 03:29:16PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Right, the next step would be to bridge that gap to iommu-dma to dump the
> flush queue when IOVA allocation failure implies we've reached the
> "rollover" point, and perhaps not use the timer at all. By that point a
> dedicated domain type, or at least some definite internal flag, for this
> alternate behaviour seems like the logical way to go.
At least on this direction, I've been thinking it would be nice to
replace the domain type _FQ with a flag inside the domain, maybe the
ops, saying how the domain wants the common DMA API to operate. If it
wants FQ mode or other tuning parameters
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists