[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxDZd8MQtrTLLNmC@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:10:31 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbaron@...mai.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] DYNAMIC_DEBUG for this cycle
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:35:30AM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> Hi Greg, Jason,
>
> Please consider these for this rc-cycle.
> - 1-9 have Jason's Ack,
> - 9th removes unused EXPORTed fn.
> - 10 is simple var cleanup
> - 11 is a partial decoupling of dyndbg from kernel/module
>
> Jim Cromie (11):
> dyndbg: fix static_branch manipulation
> dyndbg: fix module.dyndbg handling
> dyndbg: show both old and new in change-info
> dyndbg: reverse module walk in cat control
> dyndbg: reverse module.callsite walk in cat control
> dyndbg: use ESCAPE_SPACE for cat control
> dyndbg: let query-modname override actual module name
> dyndbg: add test_dynamic_debug module
> dyndbg: drop EXPORTed dynamic_debug_exec_queries
> dyndbg: cleanup auto vars in dynamic_debug_init
> dyndbg: create and use struct _ddebug_info
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> include/linux/dynamic_debug.h | 22 ++----
> kernel/module/internal.h | 4 +-
> kernel/module/main.c | 18 ++---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 +++
> lib/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/dynamic_debug.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> lib/test_dynamic_debug.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++
> 8 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/test_dynamic_debug.c
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
Is this still ok for linux-next now to go into 6.1-rc1?
Or does it need to be rebased?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists