lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxDZd8MQtrTLLNmC@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:10:31 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbaron@...mai.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] DYNAMIC_DEBUG for this cycle

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:35:30AM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> Hi Greg, Jason,
> 
> Please consider these for this rc-cycle.
>   - 1-9 have Jason's Ack,
>   - 9th removes unused EXPORTed fn.
>   - 10 is simple var cleanup
>   - 11 is a partial decoupling of dyndbg from kernel/module
> 
> Jim Cromie (11):
>   dyndbg: fix static_branch manipulation
>   dyndbg: fix module.dyndbg handling
>   dyndbg: show both old and new in change-info
>   dyndbg: reverse module walk in cat control
>   dyndbg: reverse module.callsite walk in cat control
>   dyndbg: use ESCAPE_SPACE for cat control
>   dyndbg: let query-modname override actual module name
>   dyndbg: add test_dynamic_debug module
>   dyndbg: drop EXPORTed dynamic_debug_exec_queries
>   dyndbg: cleanup auto vars in dynamic_debug_init
>   dyndbg: create and use struct _ddebug_info
> 
>  MAINTAINERS                   |   2 +
>  include/linux/dynamic_debug.h |  22 ++----
>  kernel/module/internal.h      |   4 +-
>  kernel/module/main.c          |  18 ++---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug             |  10 +++
>  lib/Makefile                  |   1 +
>  lib/dynamic_debug.c           | 141 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  lib/test_dynamic_debug.c      |  70 +++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 lib/test_dynamic_debug.c
> 
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 

Is this still ok for linux-next now to go into 6.1-rc1?

Or does it need to be rebased?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ