[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220901122739.6d1a54ef@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:27:39 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Frederick Lawler <fred@...udflare.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in:
security/selinux/include/classmap.h
between commit:
f4d653dcaa4e ("selinux: implement the security_uring_cmd() LSM hook")
from Linus' tree and commit:
ed5d44d42c95 ("selinux: Implement userns_create hook")
from the security tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc security/selinux/include/classmap.h
index 1c2f41ff4e55,0bff55bb9cde..000000000000
--- a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
@@@ -253,7 -253,9 +253,9 @@@ const struct security_class_mapping sec
{ "anon_inode",
{ COMMON_FILE_PERMS, NULL } },
{ "io_uring",
- { "override_creds", "sqpoll", NULL } },
+ { "override_creds", "sqpoll", "cmd", NULL } },
+ { "user_namespace",
+ { "create", NULL } },
{ NULL }
};
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists