[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxD1byMGE03R8YWT@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 20:09:51 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Kai Ye <yekai13@...wei.com>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wangzhou1@...ilicon.com, liulongfang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] Documentation: add a isolation strategy sysfs
node for uacce
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:00:40AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 05:04:08PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:29:42AM +0800, Kai Ye wrote:
> > > Update documentation describing sysfs node that could help to
> > > configure isolation strategy for users in the user space. And
> > > describing sysfs node that could read the device isolated state.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kai Ye <yekai13@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce
> > > index 08f2591138af..e09fd160d3fa 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce
> > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,32 @@ Contact: linux-accelerators@...ts.ozlabs.org
> > > Description: Available instances left of the device
> > > Return -ENODEV if uacce_ops get_available_instances is not provided
> > >
> > > +What: /sys/class/uacce/<dev_name>/isolate_strategy
> > > +Date: Jul 2022
> >
> > July was a while ago, you sent this patch in August :(
> >
>
> Does the date in the sysfs documentation files serve any purpose besides making
> people have to update their patchsets every month?
>
> The kernel version number would be more useful to readers of the documentation,
> and it wouldn't have to be updated quite as often.
True, I have seen people use that instead, or no date at all, I don't
require it. But if you do put the field in there, it should at least be
correct :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists