linux-kernel - [tip: x86/mm] x86/mm: Refuse W^X violations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <166205622353.401.14415663682148720649.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:17:03 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/mm] x86/mm: Refuse W^X violations

The following commit has been merged into the x86/mm branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     652c5bf380ad018e15006a7f8349800245ddbbad
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/652c5bf380ad018e15006a7f8349800245ddbbad
Author:        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:18:03 +02:00
Committer:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CommitterDate: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:10:19 -07:00

x86/mm: Refuse W^X violations

x86 has STRICT_*_RWX, but not even a warning when someone violates it.

Add this warning and fully refuse the transition.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YwySW3ROc21hN7g9@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
 arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
index 6a9043b..1a2d637 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
@@ -580,6 +580,33 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long start,
 }
 
 /*
+ * Validate and enforce strict W^X semantics.
+ */
+static inline pgprot_t verify_rwx(pgprot_t old, pgprot_t new, unsigned long start,
+				  unsigned long pfn, unsigned long npg)
+{
+	unsigned long end;
+
+	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_NX))
+		return new;
+
+	if (!((pgprot_val(old) ^ pgprot_val(new)) & (_PAGE_RW | _PAGE_NX)))
+		return new;
+
+	if ((pgprot_val(new) & (_PAGE_RW | _PAGE_NX)) != _PAGE_RW)
+		return new;
+
+	end = start + npg * PAGE_SIZE - 1;
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "CPA refuse W^X violation: %016llx -> %016llx range: 0x%016lx - 0x%016lx PFN %lx\n",
+		  (unsigned long long)pgprot_val(old),
+		  (unsigned long long)pgprot_val(new),
+		  start, end, pfn);
+
+	/* refuse the transition into WX */
+	return old;
+}
+
+/*
  * Lookup the page table entry for a virtual address in a specific pgd.
  * Return a pointer to the entry and the level of the mapping.
  */
@@ -885,6 +912,8 @@ static int __should_split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
 	new_prot = static_protections(req_prot, lpaddr, old_pfn, numpages,
 				      psize, CPA_DETECT);
 
+	new_prot = verify_rwx(old_prot, new_prot, lpaddr, old_pfn, numpages);
+
 	/*
 	 * If there is a conflict, split the large page.
 	 *
@@ -1525,6 +1554,7 @@ repeat:
 
 	if (level == PG_LEVEL_4K) {
 		pte_t new_pte;
+		pgprot_t old_prot = pte_pgprot(old_pte);
 		pgprot_t new_prot = pte_pgprot(old_pte);
 		unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(old_pte);
 
@@ -1536,6 +1566,8 @@ repeat:
 		new_prot = static_protections(new_prot, address, pfn, 1, 0,
 					      CPA_PROTECT);
 
+		new_prot = verify_rwx(old_prot, new_prot, address, pfn, 1);
+
 		new_prot = pgprot_clear_protnone_bits(new_prot);
 
 		/*