[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxEMIdBMOeDBsu5D@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 22:46:41 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>
Cc: jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, rtanwar@...linear.com,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, talel@...zon.com, hhhawa@...zon.com,
jonnyc@...zon.com, hanochu@...zon.com, ronenk@...zon.com,
itamark@...zon.com, shellykz@...zon.com, shorer@...zon.com,
amitlavi@...zon.com, almogbs@...zon.com, dkl@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/19] hwmon: (mr75203) add debugfs to read and write
temperature coefficients
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:54:21AM +0300, Farber, Eliav wrote:
> On 8/31/2022 3:14 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 07:22:11PM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote:
...
> > > + pvt->dbgfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(dev), NULL);
> >
> > > + if (!pvt->dbgfs_dir) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to create dbgfs_dir\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> >
> > No, just don't check the return value of debugfs API calls.
> >
> Do you mean that I should just do:
> debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(dev), NULL);
> Can you please explain why it's OK to ignore the return value?
Author of the debugfs is speaking:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20190122152151.16139-38-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org/
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists