[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxEvtWpCQHpy3Vzf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 01:18:29 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] selftests/sgx: retry the ioctls returned with EAGAIN
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:14:02AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 8/30/22 19:31, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >> On 8/29/2022 8:12 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >>> From: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> For EMODT and EREMOVE ioctls with a large range, kernel
> >> ioctl()s?
> > Ioctl is common enough to be considered as noun and is
> > widely phrased like that in commit messages. I don't
> > see any added clarity.
>
> I definitely prefer ioctl().
I can use it.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists