linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tools: Add new "test" taint to kernel-chktaint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 16:44:29 -0700
From:   Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: Add new "test" taint to kernel-chktaint

On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 11:57 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/23/22 22:41, David Gow wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:19 PM Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Commit c272612cb4a2 ("kunit: Taint the kernel when KUnit tests are run")
> >> added a new taint flag for when in-kernel tests run. This commit adds
> >> recognition of this new flag in kernel-chktaint.
> >>
>
> What happens without this change? It isn't clear what this change is
> fixing.

Without this change the correct reason will not be displayed if the kernel
is tainted because of a test.

>
> >> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - based off of kselftest/kunit branch
> >> - Added David's Reviewed-by tag
> >>
> >
> > This still looks good to me.
> >
> > Unless anyone objects, I guess we'll take this through the KUnit
> > branch (which, after all, is where the taint was originally added).
> > I've added it to the list for 6.1, but it technically could be
> > considered a fix for 6.0 as well.
> >
>
> I can definitely take this for Linux 6.0 with additional information
> on the problems seen without this change.

Great, thank you very much.

>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>