linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] Re: powerpc-linux-objdump: Warning: Unrecognized form: 0x23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7ae875e-cdd6-842c-6023-ced0c3d65f47@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 05:44:06 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
CC:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "kbuild-all@...ts.01.org" <kbuild-all@...ts.01.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: powerpc-linux-objdump: Warning: Unrecognized
 form: 0x23



Le 01/09/2022 à 04:03, Nathan Chancellor a écrit :
> Hi Rong,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:15:58AM +0800, Chen, Rong A wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/31/2022 11:40 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:52:36PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>>> head:   dcf8e5633e2e69ad60b730ab5905608b756a032f
>>>> commit: f9b3cd24578401e7a392974b3353277286e49cee Kconfig.debug: make DEBUG_INFO selectable from a choice
>>>> date:   5 months ago
>>>> config: powerpc-buildonly-randconfig-r003-20220830 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220831/202208311414.4OPuYS9K-lkp@intel.com/config)
>>>> compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c7df82e4693c19e3fd2e25c83eb04d9deb7b7b59)
>>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>>>           wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>           chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>           # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
>>>>           # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
>>>>           # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f9b3cd24578401e7a392974b3353277286e49cee
>>>>           git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>>>>           git fetch --no-tags linus master
>>>>           git checkout f9b3cd24578401e7a392974b3353277286e49cee
>>>>           # save the config file
>>>>           mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>>>>           COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=powerpc SHELL=/bin/bash
>>>>
>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>>>
>>>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>>
>>>>>> powerpc-linux-objdump: Warning: Unrecognized form: 0x23
>>>
>>> Given this is clang 16.0.0 with
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y, which uses DWARF5 by
>>> default instead of DWARF4, it looks like older binutils not
>>> understanding DWARF5. What version of binutils is being used by the bot?
>>
>> Hi Nathan,
>>
>> We're using binutils v2.38.90.20220713-2
>>
>> ||/ Name           Version            Architecture Description
>> +++-==============-==================-============-==========================================
>> ii  binutils       2.38.90.20220713-2 amd64        GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
> 
> Thanks for chiming in! This looks like the output of 'dpkg -l', right? I
> noticed on second glance that the tuple for the objdump warning above is
> 'powerpc-linux-', which leads me to believe that a kernel.org toolchain
> (or a self compiled one) is being used. I would expect the tuple to be
> 'powerpc-linux-gnu-' if Debian's package was being used. Is that
> possible?
> 

To get the crosstool binutils version, just do:

	ppc-linux-objdump -v

Thanks
Christophe