linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 16/21] dma-buf: Move dma_buf_attach() to dynamic locking specification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4e82d32f-6e5f-edaf-17f4-4381f762ac21@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:07:00 +0200
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
        Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
        Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@...labora.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
        Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Hellström <thomas_os@...pmail.org>,
        Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Amol Maheshwari <amahesh@....qualcomm.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomba@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kernel@...labora.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/21] dma-buf: Move dma_buf_attach() to dynamic
 locking specification

Am 31.08.22 um 17:37 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
> Move dma-buf attachment API functions to the dynamic locking specification
> by taking the reservation lock around the mapping operations. The strict
> locking convention prevents deadlock situations for dma-buf importers and
> exporters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>

> ---
>   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 20 ++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index ceea4839c641..073942bf5ae9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -858,8 +858,8 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>   	    dma_buf_is_dynamic(dmabuf)) {
>   		struct sg_table *sgt;
>   
> +		dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>   		if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf)) {
> -			dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>   			ret = dmabuf->ops->pin(attach);
>   			if (ret)
>   				goto err_unlock;
> @@ -872,8 +872,7 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>   			ret = PTR_ERR(sgt);
>   			goto err_unpin;
>   		}
> -		if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf))
> -			dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv);
> +		dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv);
>   		attach->sgt = sgt;
>   		attach->dir = DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL;
>   	}
> @@ -889,8 +888,7 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>   		dmabuf->ops->unpin(attach);
>   
>   err_unlock:
> -	if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf))
> -		dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv);
> +	dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv);
>   
>   	dma_buf_detach(dmabuf, attach);
>   	return ERR_PTR(ret);
> @@ -936,21 +934,19 @@ void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
>   	if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !attach))
>   		return;
>   
> +	dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> +
>   	if (attach->sgt) {
> -		if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf))
> -			dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>   
>   		__unmap_dma_buf(attach, attach->sgt, attach->dir);
>   
> -		if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf)) {
> +		if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf))
>   			dmabuf->ops->unpin(attach);
> -			dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv);
> -		}
>   	}
> -
> -	dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>   	list_del(&attach->node);
> +
>   	dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
> +
>   	if (dmabuf->ops->detach)
>   		dmabuf->ops->detach(dmabuf, attach);
>