[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHUa44E6nMEw+w6fA71X7oGdcXnBEroDHfNODCxHSZLxsLaPCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:26:00 +0200
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
Marc Bonnici <marc.bonnici@....com>,
Valentin Laurent <valentin.laurent@...stonic.com>,
Lukas Hanel <lukas.hanel@...stonic.com>,
Coboy Chen <coboy.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] tee: optee: Drop ffa_ops in optee_ffa structure
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:29 PM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:57, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 04:28:01PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 15:40, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Since the ffa_device itself carries ffa_dev_ops now, there is no need
> > > > to keep a copy in optee_ffa structure.
> > > >
> > > > Drop ffa_ops in the optee_ffa structure as it is not needed anymore.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 9 ++++-----
> > > > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 1 -
> > > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is this patch doing anything different from patch #2? If not then I
> > > think both should be squashed.
> > >
> >
> > Indeed, I thought about squashing them and forgot before getting there.
> > Does the review tag still apply for 2/9 after I squash this into it.
> >
>
> Yeah, feel free to apply my review tag.
Same for me.
Cheers,
Jens
>
> -Sumit
>
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists