linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] Fix make.cross for 0day bot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQYiRr2-m73bBK-Ly8Tg35SK+nJw5bxULhuFh1vG=nN8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:20:48 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
Cc:     lkp@...ts.01.org, 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] Fix make.cross for 0day bot

On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 4:06 PM Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 03:55:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hello,  maintainers of Intel 0day bot,
> >
> > make.cross is supposed to use the latest GCC by default
> > (according to the comment "use highest available version")
> > but actually chooses GCC 9.3.0 rather than gcc-12.1.0.
>
> thanks a lot for pointing out the issue and fixing it. Do you mind to send
> a PR to https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests, or you suggest we composing
> a patch based on your fix below?
>


Sure, I will make a PR.
Thanks.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada