[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e19ae05-3cc2-d913-dd2c-a1c4be222508@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:01:05 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: align RPM regulators node name
with bindings
On 01/09/2022 11:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Node names should be generic and new DT schema expects RPM regulators
> node to be just "regulators". Rename them while keeping similar naming
> style within PMIC families on different boards, e.g.
> pm660l-regulators -> regulators-0
> pm660-regulators -> regulators-1
> which creates in few places big diff.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Not tested on hardware, but I do not expect functional impact.
> ---
Eh, crap, I found few more of nodes to fix. There will be a v2.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists