linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: align RPM regulators node name with bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:01:05 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: align RPM regulators node name
 with bindings

On 01/09/2022 11:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Node names should be generic and new DT schema expects RPM regulators
> node to be just "regulators".  Rename them while keeping similar naming
> style within PMIC families on different boards, e.g.
> 	pm660l-regulators -> regulators-0
> 	pm660-regulators -> regulators-1
> which creates in few places big diff.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Not tested on hardware, but I do not expect functional impact.
> ---

Eh, crap, I found few more of nodes to fix. There will be a v2.


Best regards,
Krzysztof