[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxB2Ff9f+pM9W9Zf@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:06:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com, ravi.bangoria@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] perf/x86/intel: Move the topdown stuff into the
intel driver
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:41:06AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > static void intel_pmu_reset(void)
> > {
> > struct debug_store *ds = __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.ds);
> > @@ -4635,6 +4653,10 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu
> > .enable_all = core_pmu_enable_all,
> > .enable = core_pmu_enable_event,
> > .disable = x86_pmu_disable_event,
> > +
> > + .set_period = intel_pmu_set_period,
> > + .update = intel_pmu_update,
>
> I tried the patch, but it impacts the topdown.
> The root cause is that these should be added for intel_pmu rather than
> core_pmu.
>
Dang; must be a rebase fail on my end, sorry about that. Let me go fix
that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists