linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/158] 5.19.6-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YxB/stkbJtsz6IgY@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:47:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/158] 5.19.6-rc1 review

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:37:26AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 12:57:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.6 release.
> > There are 158 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:57:37 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819):
> mips: 59 configs -> 1 failure
> arm: 99 configs -> no failure
> arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
> x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
> alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
> csky allmodconfig -> fails
> powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
> riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
> s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
> xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
> 
> mips and csky are known failure. Fix not yet in mainline.
> 
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
> x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
> arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
> mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
> 
> DRM warnings in rpi4b, now fixed in mainline.
> Will need:
> 258e483a4d5e ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Rework power up")
> 72e2329e7c9b ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Depends on CONFIG_PM")

Both now queued up, thanks!

greg k-h