[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edb52cfe-27c6-547f-962d-cde3a2ef4294@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:54:26 +0300
From: "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
CC: <jdelvare@...e.com>, <linux@...ck-us.net>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <rtanwar@...linear.com>,
<linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <talel@...zon.com>,
<hhhawa@...zon.com>, <jonnyc@...zon.com>, <hanochu@...zon.com>,
<ronenk@...zon.com>, <itamark@...zon.com>, <shellykz@...zon.com>,
<shorer@...zon.com>, <amitlavi@...zon.com>, <almogbs@...zon.com>,
<dkl@...zon.com>, "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/19] hwmon: (mr75203) parse temperature coefficients from
device-tree
On 8/31/2022 3:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 07:22:10PM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote:
>> Use thermal coefficients from the device tree if they exist.
>> Otherwise, use default values according to the series (5 or 6).
>> All coefficients can be used or only part of them.
>>
>> The coefficients shall be used for fine tuning the default values since
>> coefficients can vary between product and product.
>
> ...
>
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "moortec,ts-coeff-h", &coeff_h);
>
> of_ ?! Ditto for the rest.
Fixed for v4.
I replaced it with device_property_read_u32().
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ts_coeff->h = coeff_h;
>
> ...
>
>> + ret = of_property_read_s32(np, "moortec,ts-coeff-j", &coeff_j);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ts_coeff->j = coeff_j;
>
> You may avoid conditional:
>
> _property_read_s32(..., "moortec,ts-coeff-j", &ts_coeff->j);
Fixed for v4.
I removed the condition.
> ...
>
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "moortec,ts-coeff-cal5",
>> &coeff_cal5);
>> + if (!ret) {
>
>> + if (coeff_cal5 == 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "moortec,ts-coeff-cal5 can't be
>> 0\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Code shouldn't be a YAML validator. Drop this and make sure you have
> correct
> DT schema.
Fixed for v4.
I dropped the validation check.
The YAML already mentions that it can't be 0.
>> + ts_coeff->cal5 = coeff_cal5;
>> + }
--
Thanks, Eliav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists